Latest ArticlesThere’s no norovirus outbreak in the UK – so why is a sharp rise in patients being reported? This 17th-century portrait was given plumper lips years after it was finished – an expert explains why Holocaust comparisons are overused — but in the case of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel they may reflect more than just the emotional response of a traumatized people Seven original 1970s skateparks that show why these urban treasures should be protected Ukraine recap: western divisions an ominous sign for Kyiv as the aid funding tap begins to dry up Climate ‘tipping points’ can be positive too – our report sets out how to engineer a domino effect of rapid changes Boris Johnson at the COVID inquiry: sullen, evasive and a danger to democracy How bird feeders help small species fight infection Why Israel’s intelligence chiefs failed to listen to October 7 warnings – and the lessons to be learned New investment labels aim to help savers spot sustainable products – but won’t always stop greenwashing
Gwyneth Paltrow has won a $300,000 lawsuit against a website that published a false story about her. The victory has spawned a slew of internet gags and jokes about the actress, who is known for her often outrageous life choices.
The lawsuit was brought against the website, Goop, which claimed in an article that Paltrow had cancelled a “Goop Summit” event due to a lack of ticket sales. The article went on to make further false claims about the actress.
Paltrow denied the claims and sued the website for defamation. The website was found liable and was ordered to pay the actress $300,000 in damages.
The ruling has sparked a wave of online jokes and comments about Paltrow, with many poking fun at her often-controversial lifestyle. Some of the jokes poked fun at her often-expensive tastes and products she has endorsed, while others made light of her habit of giving her children unusual names.
The ruling also sparked a debate about the power of celebrities and their ability to sue for defamation. Some argued that the ruling was an example of Paltrow's influence and power, while others argued that it sends the wrong message and could discourage legitimate criticism of the actress.
In any case, the ruling has prompted a slew of jokes and memes about Paltrow, which have been shared widely across the internet. Whether or not the ruling was fair, it has certainly caused a stir and given people something to talk about.